Social Administration

Social policy is an applied subject; it was developed to meet the need of people who would be working in the public services. Social administration[1] is the area of the field concerned with the practicalities of service organization and delivery. In the European Union, it is dealt with as "public policy" or "policy analysis".

1. Sectors influenced of the social policy administration [2] 

·         public sector (provision by the state),

·         private (provision for profit by commercial organizations or individuals),

·         voluntary (provision on a non-profit basis),

·         mutual aid (provision by solidarity) and

·         Informal (provision by friends, neighbors and families).

The idea of the “welfare state” means the same as “state welfare”, and opposition is seen as a commitment to the “private market”. In my opinion, this is a false choice. The state is not the only provider of welfare in any country, and the “private market” does not consist of activity for profit, but a wide range of different motivations.

There is a “mixed economy of welfare”. The state does not operate in isolation; rather, it acts in conjunction with a number of non-statutory organizations. The state is actively involved in regulation, finance or subsidy, and direct provision.

A) The public sector[3]

There are four main arguments for public sector provision.

·         Universal standards

The state is uniquely able to impose a general rйgime, and so can ensure uniform or minimum standards.

·         Social control

Control is used where people need protection (e.g. child abuse), as punishment (like prisoners), and where control increases freedom (like compulsory education).

·         Economic benefit

The state may be able to perform the action more cost-effectively than is the case elsewhere. National health systems have proved to be cheaper than many liberal systems.

·         Residual provision

The state may act as a safety net where other sectors do not provide. Paul Spicker in his monograph “The welfare state: a general theory, 2000” sais: “The main arguments against are that state provision does not have clear incentives to reduce unit costs, state provision can be the source of patronage or corruption and states make decisions for people who could choose for themselves.”

B) The private sector

·         choice for the consumer

·         a service led by the consumer rather than by the professions

·         more efficient services at lower costs (because this increases profitability)

·         responsiveness to need (because their payment depends on it)

·         Education of people as to the implications of their choices.

If poor people cannot afford services, we can give them the money to decide for themselves - as we do with food and clothing; there does not have to be a publicly provided service. The main arguments against this position are:

·         Market failure

Markets do not work if people do not have choice (e.g. in health care), where there are monopolies, and if people do not bear the costs of their actions themselves.

·         Exclusion: markets exclude “bad risks” and people with extreme needs.

·         Social preference: markets respond to individual preferences; social needs may be different.

C) Mutual aid

Mutual aid is sometimes represented as private, and sometimes as voluntary. There is a good case to consider this category as a sector in itself, because the organization and behavior of solidarity groups is quite different from that of other non-profit organizations. Historically, mutual aid was one of the main foundations of welfare organizations, through trades unions, professional associations and friendly societies; in many countries, solidarity services of this kind have continued to be one of the main focuses through which welfare is provided.

The central principle of mutual aid has been voluntary collective effort, which is both self-interested and supportive of others. People who enter such arrangements make some kind of contribution - such as paying a subscription, offering labor, or participating in management - and receive support on a mutual basis. The most common model is probably a system of voluntary insurance, usually for income maintenance or health care, which offers social protection in return for a basic contribution. There are many other examples, including co-operatives, self-help groups, and the trades unions themselves.

The scope of mutual aid is considerable, but solidarity cannot be comprehensive: some people have a limited ability to contribute, and others are likely to be excluded by the conditions of membership.

D) The voluntary sector

The voluntary sector is extremely diverse, ranging from small local societies to large, "professional" agencies. Jones, Brown and Bradshaw[5] classify the different types of volunteering as follows:

·   direct service giving

·   running voluntary organizations

·   participation or self-help groups

·   fundraising

·   public service (many elected officials are unpaid volunteers)

·   Pressure group activity.

·    The role of the voluntary sector is often supplementary to statutory services, but it can also be seen as complementary through:

·    the initiation of new approaches and techniques

·   the development of specialist expertise

·   the establishment of “partnerships” with statutory services - like the provision of meals on wheels

·   Provision to groups which statutory services do not reach, like drug addicts.

E) The informal sector

The “informal sector” consists of communities, friends, neighbors and kin organizations. They can be formal or informal and it depends of exist national regulation in this sector.  The emphasis on informal care has grown for three reasons:

·   Ideology: conservatives have emphasized the pluralistic nature of welfare, and an "organic view" of society as a series of interconnecting relationships, and the role of family and duty.

·   The emphasis on community care: the discharge of people from institutions, and maintenance of individuals at home, has led to a greater emphasis on the role of careers.

·   Comprehensive planning: most care is provided by informal careers, not the state; the role of the state is supplementary to the care given by others. Planning has to take this into account.

This specific approach has led to a range of criticisms. Feminist writers have criticized the burden imposed on women. Most care of this type occurs within families, and in practice the burden falls substantially on women within families. The economic costs to careers are underestimated because they are not charged. The social costs to careers also need to be considered. Service to dependent individuals is often unexamined. Careers may be well-meaning, but they will not necessarily offer the best care.

2. The public services and their structure

The structure of services varies with government structure, history, and service development; many developed economies have complex activities of agencies, schemes and programs. There are described five levels of service provision. They are:

A)    Comprehensive field coverage

This is the level of policy-making and planning, creating a framework of services to meet a range of needs. This level is sometimes missing where coverage is done through programs and ad hoc services rather than by government.

B)     Comprehensive service provision

This is the organization and direction of a service or program, like a housing department or social services department. There is a broad territorial focus, and specific responses are not prescribed.

C)     Systematic service provision

This is a responsibility for performing particular functions within a service. Examples are schools, residential care homes or the units within a hospital.

D)    Dealing with problems as situations

This is generally the level at which professionals work; the test is that the professional is able to define the problem and the response. Doctors, social workers, health visitors, area housing managers and police officers work at this level.

E)     Dealing with problems as demand

This is a reactive approach, where service is provided in response to a specific demand; the response made is prescribed for the person who makes it. Receptionists or social security clerical officers are examples.

3. Social service management

There are two traditional models of administration: professionalism and bureaucracy. In end of Twentieth century, a new model of "management" has been added and it develops until recent days.

A) Planning

Policy has to be put into practice. Service planning is a process of making implementation explicit. This is usually represented as either an "incremental" or a "rational-comprehensive" process. Incremental plans are based on what has gone before. The "rational" model has seven stages:

·   Evaluation of the environment. Decisions have to be taken in the light of existing situations.

·   The identification of aims and objectives. Criteria have to be established by which decisions can subsequently be evaluated.

·   Consideration of the alternative methods which are available.

·   Examination of the consequences. Possible consequences are judged against the aims and objectives in order to decide their likely effect.

·   Selection of methods. The choice of methods is guided by consideration of efficiency and practical constraints.

·   Implementation. There has to be a plan for how and when things will be done, and who will do them.

·   Re-evaluation. The consequences of policy are monitored, and fed back into a re-assessment of the environment - at which point the process begins again.

The rational-comprehensive model asks for too much detail to be practical, but at least it helps to make things explicit. A minimally adequate plan needs a statement of aims, selection of methods, and an action plan covering implementation and criteria for evaluation.

B) Public finance

The sources of finance for public services are hugely varied in countries members of EU: they include, for example, tax, levies, borrowing, charges, commercial profits, public subscription, sales of licenses, voluntary donation, labor conscription and lottery funding. Public services also tend to be limited by special rules which do not apply to private firms. For example, in order to avoid distortions in the operation of the independent sector, the public services may not be allowed to diversify activities or their financial base. In the interests of economic management, public services are not always allowed to transfer money across budget heads; this means that they cannot carry losses or unspent funds across financial years, or use money allocated for one purpose for another.

Public expenditure commitments tend to be inflexible. This happens in part because many of the beneficiaries of public expenditure, like pensioners, have established entitlements, but also because macro-economic management calls for a degree of stability in overall spending patterns. Adjustments to budgets have to be made incrementally. Public sector budgeting is usually divided between revenue and capital expenditure.

·   Revenue expenditure deals with regular and recurring spending. This may be managed by a program budget, which is based on total expenditure for a program or category (for example, expenditure on “social security” or “old people”). Spending has consequences for other services within the same expenditure category.

·   Capital expenditure is more problematic. It is mainly used for consumption by government - the purpose of capital finance is to buy something. However, because government finance is usually geared to annual revenue, as part of economic management, capital expenditure has to be converted into manageable chunks, or “tranches”. In large-scale capital projects, resources are budgeted for in installments until the project is finished. This has often been associated with serious failures of control.

C) Evaluating policy

·   Effectiveness: the most basic form of evaluation of policy is to ask whether it meets its objectives. A policy is effective if it meets its aims. It is "cost-effective" if it meets its aims at the lowest cost possible.

·   Efficiency is an economic concept, which should be distinguished clearly from effectiveness. A process is efficient if it produces goods at the lowest possible cost per unit. Achieving every aim may be inefficient, because some aims are more expensive and difficult than others, and because when agencies are straining to meet targets costs are likely to rise. Public services often have no choice about meeting certain aims - for example, keeping destitute people alive, or ensuring that long-term nursing care is available for frail elderly people - and they tend to aim for cost effectiveness rather than efficiency.

·   Equity: the principle of equal rights or fairness is an important issue in service delivery. Equity means that like cases are treated alike. Procedural fairness is concerned with procedures, like non-discrimination; substantive fairness with outcomes. Le Grand points to several different measures:

-         public expenditure - whether people have different amounts of money spent on them

-         final income - whether the amount of money spent has an equivalent effect on the recipients

-         use - whether people are able to use the service to an equivalent extent

-         cost - whether people suffer equivalent costs as a result of their problems;

-         Outcome - whether people finish in equivalent positions.

There are other implicit criteria, which are only triggered when there are problems: examples are ethical assumptions, financial constraints, or political support.

D) Service delivery and targeting

Social policies have to affect someone, and any attempt to identify a client group specifically can be referred to as "targeting". Policies may be focused on a range of different groups: individuals, households, families, communities, and sections of the population. Distribution to everyone is exceptional - most "universal" benefits are, in fact, categorical, and targeted at a broad class of people in need (like children or old people) as a way of addressing needs within the group. The World Bank has argued, in developing countries, for "indicator targeting", focusing on broad areas of the population.

Three main problems affect the efficiency of targeted services.

·   Deadweight: people receive the service or benefit, but their circumstances are not materially affected by the measure.

·   Spillovers: people are helped who it was not intended or necessary to help.

·   Low take-up: there is failure to reach those at whom the policy was targeted.

Targeting is sometimes confused with selectivity (services which are confined to the poor or people in need); this has further problems associated with testing and exclusion. Some degree of targeting is unavoidable, and the main issue raised in practice is how to overcome these problems.